What a recent funding round does and does not tell you about the value of ordinary shares

What does a recent round actually price?

A priced round records what the investor or investors agreed to pay, on a named date, for a named number of shares of a named class, usually a preference class carrying rights ordinary shares do not have. Where the round is genuinely arm's length, that is real, contemporaneous evidence of what somebody was prepared to pay for that specific bundle of rights. It is not, by itself, a statement about what an ordinary share is worth. The ATO's ESS market value guidance has no page on valuing unlisted shares, and we have found no published ATO rule that treats a funding round price as the market value of an ordinary share ^{1, 2, 3}. The ATO's own safe harbour guidance gives a valuation prepared for capital raising purposes as one example of an alternative method a company might use to work out market value for the ESS start-up concession, alongside a discounted cash flow model ¹. The comparison means the company still needs a value under an approved method it was eligible to use, the same conditions apply, including the change of control condition, and the protection is limited to the market value test in section 83A-33(5) ^{1, 4, 5}. The valuation must be of an ordinary share; the negotiated round price is not itself such a valuation.

The reason the two figures diverge is structural. Investors buying into a round are usually buying preference shares, which typically carry a liquidation preference, participation rights or anti-dilution protection that ordinary shares do not. Ordinary shareholders, including employees holding ESS interests, rank behind those rights. A price agreed for the senior instrument is not automatically the price of the junior one. Why the two classes are rarely worth the same amount per share is worked through in our guide to ordinary and preference shares, and the mechanics of the round itself, pre-money, post-money and dilution, are worked through in our guide to pre-money and post-money valuation.

Where does the round fit inside an ESS safe harbour valuation?

For the ESS start-up concession, the relevant question is the market value of an ordinary share at the time an interest is provided, the section 83A-33(5) test ⁶. Legislative Instrument LI 2025/19 (F2025L01085, in force from 1 October 2025) sets out two approved safe harbour methods for working that out ⁴. One of those approved methods, Method Two, the net tangible assets method, is only available where the company has not raised more than $10 million, debt and equity combined, in the 12 months before the valuation time, among its other conditions ⁴. Raise more than that in the relevant 12 month window and Method Two is off the table regardless of anything else about the business ⁴. How both approved methods actually work, their full conditions, and what "binding on the Commissioner" covers is set out in our guide to how ESS valuations work; this page only needs the one fact that a recent raise changes: it can remove Method Two as an available path.

Can the round agreement itself stand in as the ESS valuation document?

Separately from the safe harbour, an unlisted company relying on the Corporations Act ESS regime for certain offers must give supporting information that includes a valuation document under section 1100X(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 ⁷. One of the documents that section accepts is an executed or draft agreement under which ESS interests of the same class are to be acquired on arm's length terms by a third party who is not an associate, specifying the monetary consideration per interest ⁷. Whether a draft agreement carries different timing conditions from an executed one, and whether a fresh valuation document can be required again before an option or right is exercised, are questions for legal review before any specific offer is finalised.

Same class, for section 1100X(3)

The agreement has to cover interests of the same class as the ones being offered under the ESS arrangement. A preference share round agreement is evidence about preference shares. It is not, on its own, a valuation document for an offer of ordinary shares or options over ordinary shares, because those are different classes on different terms ⁷.

This matters only where the agreement covers the same class as the interests offered, for example where the round itself issued ordinary shares. It does not extend a preference round into standing in as the valuation document for an ordinary share or option offer. Exactly which unlisted ESS offers trigger the section 1100X requirement at all, and the timing that follows, is a question for legal review before any specific offer is finalised, not something resolved on this page.

What makes a round stronger or weaker evidence?

These factors are our judgement about evidential weight. Where a row cites a source, the source supports only the specific rule named, not the weighting.

How does the gap between round price and ordinary value actually work in practice?

Here is how that gap can arise, using a fictional example.

What we do with a recent round when preparing a valuation

Where a company has raised recently, in our view the round is treated as one piece of evidence to calibrate against, weighed using the factors above, rather than as the answer. The basis of value depends on the purpose: for the ESS start-up concession it is the market value of an ordinary share at acquisition under the section 83A-33(5) test ⁶; for most other tax events it is market value in its ordinary meaning, the price a hypothetical willing but not anxious buyer and seller would agree, at arm's length, at the valuation date ²; for pricing a transfer between shareholders, in our view the starting point is whatever basis the constitution or shareholders' agreement defines, which can differ from market value, and the tax position on the same transfer may still depend on market value ². The unit being valued also has to be named up front, an ordinary share, one class of shares, a parcel, an option or right, total equity, or enterprise value, because each is a different number, and calibrating a round to the wrong unit produces a number that answers the wrong question.

A cross check method is generally worth running alongside calibration to a round, consistent with the ATO's own preference for a secondary method where one is available ². Start-Up Valuations, a division of Valuation Group, prepares its reports on this work for the company, its board or its advisers, to support decisions such as an ESS grant, a share issue or a restructure. Each Simple or Standard start-up valuation is a valuation engagement, as described in the APES 225 guidelines we follow. They are not financial product advice, general or personal, and not a recommendation to any employee, option holder or investor on whether to acquire, exercise, hold, sell or accept anything, and a company relying on the ESS start-up concession or on a particular CGT treatment should confirm eligibility with its own tax adviser. The tier follows the company's structure and the purpose, not this page: an ESS grant, SAFEs or notes, several share classes or option-pool modelling is our Standard start-up valuation, while a transfer in a one-class company with no SAFEs, notes or ESS may be our Simple start-up valuation, and a start-up matter in dispute or heading to court is our dispute or court expert report. Both start-up valuations include the signed valuation and the company's DCF model. Delivery time starts once payment and all required information have been received. Our ESS and ESOP valuations and capital raise valuations pages set out how each engagement is scoped, and our pricing page carries the fee tiers and delivery terms.

Frequently asked questions